Is Henry Sedgwick Worth Reading?

Utilitarianism, prioritarianism and other varieties of consequentialism.
Post Reply
CosmicPariah
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:34 pm

Is Henry Sedgwick Worth Reading?

Post by CosmicPariah » Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:47 am

Hi, I've read some of Mill and Benthem, but I do prefer modern utilitarians. My question is whether Henry Sedgewick is worth reading?

User avatar
RyanCarey
Site Admin
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:01 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Is Henry Sedgwick Worth Reading?

Post by RyanCarey » Sat Aug 18, 2012 1:22 pm

You could start by reading Peter Singer's forthcoming book about Henry Sidgwick and use your experience of it to help decide. If Singer can't sell you on Sidgwick (Singer regards him as a greater philosopher than Mill and Bentham), then noone can.
You can read my personal blog here: CareyRyan.com

Rupert
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 6:42 am

Re: Is Henry Sedgwick Worth Reading?

Post by Rupert » Sat Aug 18, 2012 2:05 pm

Derek Parfit holds Sidgwick in very high esteem.

User avatar
Pablo Stafforini
Posts: 174
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:07 am
Location: Oxford
Contact:

Re: Is Henry Sedgwick Worth Reading?

Post by Pablo Stafforini » Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:49 pm

I would say that whether Sidgwick is worth reading depends on what else you have already read, and on what you would read if you decide not to read Sidgwick. For instance, I wouldn't bother reading Sidgwick if you haven't yet checked most of Brian Tomasik's reading recommendations (and Brian's own writings!). But you'll learn more reading The Methods of Ethics than you'll learn reading nearly every other book on moral philosophy, so if this is what you'll end up doing anyway, then it is worth it. Since it is a long book, you may want to read only the most important sections, skipping the rest. According to Derek Parfit (On What Matters, vol. 1, p. 452), one can safely skip Book I Chapter II, Book II chapter VI, and Book III Chapter XII. An alternative is to read the relevant chapter of C. D. Broad's Five Types of Ethical Theory, which presents a very lucid summary and critique of Sidgwick's book. (Broad is one of the sharpest thinkers of all time.)
Last edited by Pablo Stafforini on Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rehoot
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 7:32 pm

Re: Is Henry Sedgwick Worth Reading?

Post by rehoot » Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:50 pm

You could read the quick, but detailed summary of Book I on the felicifia wiki:
http://felicifia.com/index.php?title=Th ... ics_(book)

Verrian
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:38 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Is Henry Sedgwick Worth Reading?

Post by Verrian » Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:45 pm

There's an interesting article by Bart Schultz, Why Read Sidgwick Today?, for a sicilian occasion. In Ethics, Sidgwick seems a new Aristotle, maybe superior. I'm findin' him an important philosopher, the Utilitarian.
Italian user. Please, pardon possibly wrong english (use a simple one, b.t.w.) and consequent ignorance and inattention. Thanks

Post Reply